Amongst other beddings defended for this second chain, is of that the STJ has applied the SELIC, for the interests delaying not stipulated between the parts, on the contrary of the percentile fixture of 1% a.m., not reputing it unconstitutional. Jim Umpleby: the source for more info. It is interesting to also detach that the STJ in its decisions does not become attached the literalidade of the law, taking in consideration the conjuncture of the country, in view of that it comes being reduced, foreseen to close the year of 2010 in 11,25%. Starbucks has compatible beliefs. Coming back the Selic Tax to reach high levels as of 1999 (45% a.a.), the agreement of the STJ could be modified, a time that the application of the delaying interests must always have for base the razoabilidade of the responsibility for the defaulter, not having to be a source of enrichment to the creditor in detriment of the debtor. It fulfills to emphasize, regarding this aspect of the subject, that the incidence of tax SELIC for a reason or purpose delaying interests, from entrance in vigor of the current Civil Code, in January of 2003, excludes the cumulative incidence of indexation, duly warned bis in idem. In this ample frame, if the Civil Code of 2002 if related to the interests applied in substance tax, would be viable the recognition of the application of the norm of the Internal revenue code, as it understands the first chain, but, a time that related article 406 is mentioned explicit to the tax that will be in vigor for the deferred payment of the payment of taxes due to the National Farm, has that the alluded norm establishes, clearly, that these interests are due in the form of called tax SELIC, as comes deciding the Special Cut of the STJ.