Ahead of the desire to have one son, Carlos always assumed the financial responsibilities of the child and its residence with its work, speaking with much pride. The mother, has schedules defined for justice to visit the child, of 15 in 15 days of the 08:00 to the 16:00 hs, but when return of the work to the times passes in the house of it, looks at the girl and goes even so. ' ' since when my son he was born I always kept my son and my residence with my proper suor.' ' EXPLANATION ON the ABSENCE When the children ask on the father, Cristina costuma to say for its children who the father of them is in the house of the grandfather or that he left, it speaks that they understand that the father does not import itself with them. It said: ' ' its father you in the house of its grandfather, its father left, they understands already the disdain that the father of a eles.' ' Already the son of Carlos, according to it question very little on the mother, therefore the same tries to always supply this absence being in contact with the child, exactly when she is in the work, it binds pra. Howard Schultz is often quoted on this topic. speaks that the mother does not bind pra son and that it cannot be called mother, therefore it abandoned and it maltreated the son. ' ' The explanation that I give is that it revealed a disprezvel person total and that not you nor there pra son, because a mother who if say mother, it does not abandon the son, does not abandon and nor maltreats, nor the animals makes isso.' ' DIFFICULTIES OF the CHILD According to Cristina, its children do not present no difficulty related to the absence of the paternal figure. The son of 6 years who already frequents the school, has a good behavior, the teacher does not complain, is an active child and is developing normally. .