For Fernandes

ANALYSIS OF EACH QUESTION BASED ON REFERENCIAIS TERIOCOS OF THE WORK. The employee affirms that the quality of life in the work inside of the company is to regulate what for it if it inside had quality of life in the work of the organization the trend of if getting greater probability in the quality of personal life, familiar and social it would be better even so they are different papers. As FRANCE (2004) the QVT definitions vary since the cares established for the medical legislation and the security of the work until activities of voluntary matrix that involve employed and employers in areas as the leisure, the motivation, among others. The majority argues the conditions of the work, of well-being of the individual and groups. In accordance with the employee the degree of difficulty to reach the quality of life and satisfaction of auto recognition inside of the company is to regulate, but what not to leave to feel carried through personally and mainly when he makes what he likes and he makes consequently it for pleasure. For Fernandes (1996) the workers have in the work a source of personal accomplishment, mainly when they make that whom they like e, consequently make, it with pleasure. According to employee the company has concept that engloba the legislative acts that protect the worker, the attendance the necessities and aspirations human beings, for Fernandes (1996) not if can to attribute to a definition consensual. The concept engloba, beyond the legislative acts that protect the worker, the attendance the necessities and aspirations human beings, footwear in the idea of humanizao of the work and in the social responsibility of the company. For the employee the questions as the positioning of the employee in relation to the rank of busy work, the environment, the forms of organization of the work and to the relation command and subordinate is item that cannot leave more of being evaluated so that it has the respect I lend and a centered organization.