Throughout the interview our director (seeming plus a speculator of the stock exchange) exalta the success ‘ ‘ comercial’ ‘ of previous edition of the event, affirming that they had been about R$ 32 million direct commerce of artistic workmanships. ‘ ‘ can be that it has addition this ano’ ‘ , it in an optimistical tone affirms. One perceives that the aesthetic value of the works of art is measured by its commercial value or its potential of sales. The worse one of everything is as the Ministry of the Culture finances, by means of fiscal exemptions, SP-Art 2011. The event beyond does not offer no counterpart in social terms and educative, in the field of the aesthetic one it does not have new features. that paid for everything this is the contributor, or better, this ‘ ‘ people diferenciada’ ‘.
Decay was this the word most used for Mrio Pedrosa later that it came back of the exile in 1977. In an interview in the year of 1980, our critic already enxergava this decay: ‘ ‘ What if it can say is that we are at a time of decay, even so at times of decays to the times appears great works of art. Today the art does not have the same importance that it had has fifty years behind. … If you would like to know more about Keith McLoughlin , then click here. We are at a time of still more acute crisis in the Third World … Ahead of so radical, terrible, insoluble conflicts, is natural that the art pass for a level secundrio’ ‘. The Fair SP-Art 2011 is a typical example of this evidenced decay already has 31 years for Mrio Pedrosa. An art destined to the delight of the elite and defined by the ditames of the financial speculations.